Press "Enter" to skip to content

The 14th Amendment Argument in the National Debt Debate

Reading Time: < 1 minute

The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution addresses various aspects of citizenship and equal protection under the law. While it does not specifically mention the debt limit, some legal scholars argue that Section 4 of the 14th Amendment could potentially be interpreted as giving the federal government the authority to prioritize its debt payments, even if the debt limit is not raised.

Section 4 of the 14th Amendment states: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”

The argument goes that by not allowing the validity of the public debt to be questioned, the 14th Amendment implies that the government must make payments on its existing debts. If the debt limit is not raised and the government runs out of borrowing capacity, it could potentially be seen as a violation of the 14th Amendment if the government fails to prioritize debt payments.

However, it’s important to note that this interpretation of the 14th Amendment and its application to the debt limit is a subject of legal debate. The issue has not been definitively resolved by the courts, and the interpretation and implementation of the 14th Amendment can be complex and nuanced.

In practice, the debt limit is generally addressed by legislative action, with Congress passing legislation to raise or suspend the limit to avoid a default on the government’s obligations. The use of the 14th Amendment to override the debt limit has not been tested in the courts, and any attempt to rely on it would likely be subject to legal challenges and further interpretation.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow by Email